Pockets of the corporate bond market have started moving in anticipation of the U.S. losing its prized triple-A credit rating, which could force some portfolio managers to sell lower-rated corporate debt to keep the average credit quality of their holdings consistent.
Such a shift would reverse the trend of investors moving down the risk spectrum, where they have been rewarded with fatter premiums on lower-grade debt. That trend, the product of record-high cash piles and rock-bottom default rates, helped triple-B-rated issuers--at the bottom of investment-grade ratings--outperform double-A and single A-rated borrowers over the last two years. It also helped noninvestment-grade, or junk-rated, borrowers refinance a wall of maturing debt going out going out as far 2015.
Now, however, the tables appear to be turning.
Hewlett-Packard Co.'s (HPQ) single-A rated 4.3% bonds due June 2021, for example, traded Monday with a risk premium over Treasurys of 0.79 percentage point, down from a spread of 1.2 percentage point when issued in May. Risk premiums are the added return investors demand to own corporate debt instead of Treasurys, so a narrower spread means H-P's debt has risen in value.
Meanwhile, further down the ratings scale, Juniper Networks Inc.'s (JNPR) triple-B-rated 4.6% bonds due March 2021 traded Monday at a spread of 1.14 percentage points over Treasurys, according to MarketAxess data. That is much wider than the H-P spread, even though the Juniper debt also was priced with a 1.2 percentage point risk premium when the company issued the notes in February.
If enough funds are required to pull out of lower-rated corporate bonds in favor of top-rated securities--both corporate debt and, ironically, double-A rated U.S. Treasurys--it could destabilize prices among the most popular bonds since these would be the quickest to offload.
"They are more likely to sell corporates to move the average quality [of their holdings] up,he believes the fire started after the lift's Wholesale pet supplies blew, if they did not want to change their guidelines," said Steve Johnson, U.S. chief investment officer at DB Advisors. Those guidelines can be "very difficult to change," he added, and in many cases require board approval, which prevents some funds from being more nimble.
Michael Collins,They take the plastic card to the local co-op market. senior investment officer for Prudential Fixed Income, said he believes only a small percentage of portfolios will have to make sudden changes on a downgrade, however.
Anthony Valeri, fixed-income investment strategist at LPL Financial, agreed that the fallout from a downgrade on corporate bonds "would likely be modest" because only a limited number of managers would be forced to exit positions.
Additionally, a split rating, in which only one of the big-three rating agencies takes action on the U.S., wouldn't likely trigger moves, Valeri said. "Portfolio managers may still react, but it would soften the blow if weeks passed before another ratings agency proceeded with a downgrade," he said.
Rating agencies allow select U.S. corporations to be rated above the sovereign, but only a handful are rated triple-A--among them, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Automatic Data Processing Inc. (ADP).
The benefit is illustrated by the risk premium on Johnson & Johnson's 5.The application can provide Insulator to visitors,55% issue due August 2017: its risk premium has declined from 0.55 percentage point over Treasurys in early June to 0.48 percentage point now.
Corporates and financial institutions rated in the double-A category--including AA+, AA and AA-minus borrowers--sold $49 billion of bonds in the second quarter, compared with $6.a oil painting reproduction on the rear floor.2 billion from triple-A issuers, according to data provider Dealogic.
That scarcity means the stock of triple-A corporate bonds "would probably fall in half" if the U.S. were downgraded, said Johnson.the worldwide Coated Abrasives market is over $56 billion annually. U.S. government and agency bonds represent at least 37% of total triple-A debt outstanding, excluding bonds with an original maturity of 18 months or less, said Dealogic.
As a result, investors running out of high-quality supply from corporate borrowers may turn to non-U.S. sovereign debt, such as German bunds, and highly rated structured securities.
"Some portfolio managers may gravitate back to different types of asset-backed securities or commercial mortgage-backed securities, many of which still carry AAA ratings," said Collins.
Such a shift would reverse the trend of investors moving down the risk spectrum, where they have been rewarded with fatter premiums on lower-grade debt. That trend, the product of record-high cash piles and rock-bottom default rates, helped triple-B-rated issuers--at the bottom of investment-grade ratings--outperform double-A and single A-rated borrowers over the last two years. It also helped noninvestment-grade, or junk-rated, borrowers refinance a wall of maturing debt going out going out as far 2015.
Now, however, the tables appear to be turning.
Hewlett-Packard Co.'s (HPQ) single-A rated 4.3% bonds due June 2021, for example, traded Monday with a risk premium over Treasurys of 0.79 percentage point, down from a spread of 1.2 percentage point when issued in May. Risk premiums are the added return investors demand to own corporate debt instead of Treasurys, so a narrower spread means H-P's debt has risen in value.
Meanwhile, further down the ratings scale, Juniper Networks Inc.'s (JNPR) triple-B-rated 4.6% bonds due March 2021 traded Monday at a spread of 1.14 percentage points over Treasurys, according to MarketAxess data. That is much wider than the H-P spread, even though the Juniper debt also was priced with a 1.2 percentage point risk premium when the company issued the notes in February.
If enough funds are required to pull out of lower-rated corporate bonds in favor of top-rated securities--both corporate debt and, ironically, double-A rated U.S. Treasurys--it could destabilize prices among the most popular bonds since these would be the quickest to offload.
"They are more likely to sell corporates to move the average quality [of their holdings] up,he believes the fire started after the lift's Wholesale pet supplies blew, if they did not want to change their guidelines," said Steve Johnson, U.S. chief investment officer at DB Advisors. Those guidelines can be "very difficult to change," he added, and in many cases require board approval, which prevents some funds from being more nimble.
Michael Collins,They take the plastic card to the local co-op market. senior investment officer for Prudential Fixed Income, said he believes only a small percentage of portfolios will have to make sudden changes on a downgrade, however.
Anthony Valeri, fixed-income investment strategist at LPL Financial, agreed that the fallout from a downgrade on corporate bonds "would likely be modest" because only a limited number of managers would be forced to exit positions.
Additionally, a split rating, in which only one of the big-three rating agencies takes action on the U.S., wouldn't likely trigger moves, Valeri said. "Portfolio managers may still react, but it would soften the blow if weeks passed before another ratings agency proceeded with a downgrade," he said.
Rating agencies allow select U.S. corporations to be rated above the sovereign, but only a handful are rated triple-A--among them, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Automatic Data Processing Inc. (ADP).
The benefit is illustrated by the risk premium on Johnson & Johnson's 5.The application can provide Insulator to visitors,55% issue due August 2017: its risk premium has declined from 0.55 percentage point over Treasurys in early June to 0.48 percentage point now.
Corporates and financial institutions rated in the double-A category--including AA+, AA and AA-minus borrowers--sold $49 billion of bonds in the second quarter, compared with $6.a oil painting reproduction on the rear floor.2 billion from triple-A issuers, according to data provider Dealogic.
That scarcity means the stock of triple-A corporate bonds "would probably fall in half" if the U.S. were downgraded, said Johnson.the worldwide Coated Abrasives market is over $56 billion annually. U.S. government and agency bonds represent at least 37% of total triple-A debt outstanding, excluding bonds with an original maturity of 18 months or less, said Dealogic.
As a result, investors running out of high-quality supply from corporate borrowers may turn to non-U.S. sovereign debt, such as German bunds, and highly rated structured securities.
"Some portfolio managers may gravitate back to different types of asset-backed securities or commercial mortgage-backed securities, many of which still carry AAA ratings," said Collins.
没有评论:
发表评论